I. In just a few months, higher education has moved from being afraid of how generative AI like ChatGPT could help students cheat, to cautiously accepting it by allowing students to use it under certain circumstances
G. Over the last two months, we have asked students their thoughts about how AI should be used in their education
C. Students recognised that ChatGPT was helpful for summarising, brainstorming, explaining and suggesting
H. The more experience students had with ChatGPT, the more nuanced their views were
E. Students talked about how AI could remove less desirable parts of work, to focus on more important thinking
F. Students said they wanted their teachers to teach them how to best use AI tools and make AI tools a common part of education
D. Students were concerned about the disadvantages that lack of access to ChatGPT would mean for some people
B. The Australian Universities Accord discussion paper highlights AI as a significant opportunity, and challenge
A. We need to work with students, industries, communities, and governments to figure out how we can help our students engage productively and responsibly with AI
| Sources | Question: Should universities ban AI use? |
|---|---|
| Liu et al. (2023) | Benefits: Para E, C, D Limitations: F – All students should have the same resources. AI was not necessarily free. This could widen existing inequities. |
| UNSW (2024) | |
| Bjork (2023) |
1. Umbreen
- really helpful I think
2. siphiwe
- required of you
- giving any assigiment
- putting the view
- given all the evident and opinion
- really necessary
- can be quite a task
3. Trine
- talk a lot about
- abilitity show you are read widely
- built on that theory
4. HuiQing
- Reading with critical eye
- receive an expert’s opinions
- collect evidence
一息不存，道将来契 